Lutad pangkampé Jonai do supak 48 per cent ko Mising dung, sé moimnag 75 dítak po:pé Mising 100 per cent kai. A:péné 25 dítak lo ngolukké édé percentage dé nértok nam abayang chance ka:dung.Dhemaji dok cabinet kébadé Mising lokképé yakané longé pé ila du:yé.
Source:Govt. of Assam
Sapdanmílo Jonai-Murkongselek dém 1911 do Pasighat amonglo Poju Mimak lédupé British é la:té name. 1947 dítak do:pésin Mising among Jonai dé Assam so:k ara:so langa mangai. Murkongselek Transferred Area Act dok kokki 1950 lédupé Murkongselek dé Assam ara:so dungkangku. Sé le:ke do:ying sém saptékmílo Jonai dok history dém migomé respect bila mopen-morenpénam kamangai tribal belt éla block dém. Ngouk dungko amongémsin Article 370 dokkémpé me:yísula inam dé tribal réngam lokké yampok légang aima sé migom ager inamsé.
The Mising ethnic nationalism has been, of late, characterized by shift in political alignment instead of mobilization. There are concerns among the hardliners and some section of middle class that the Mising’s ethnic aspiration will be muzzled with advent of majoritarian politics. Such beliefs and doubts are natural at this juncture especially as the last bastions of nationalist constituents have moved to join national political parties. This assembly elections of Assam, 2021 is crucial in the political path of Mising ethnic nationalism. The politics of participation of Mising ethnic nationalists reflects complex equation and puzzle as a linear direction is absent. While switching alliance and support with political parties was always there in Mising ethnic politics especially among the nationalist organizations, this election is a departure from the conventional alley of parliamentary politics practiced by the nationalist organizations and political bases as the candidates are directly contesting from national political parties cutting across ideological lines. Ideally nationalist organizations backed Ganshakti was not a failed experiment but could not become a formidable force except in one assembly constituency. The mainstreaming of Mising nationalist leaders of the former student organization leaders into national political parties such as the Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian National Congress in the assembly constituencies of Dhemaji and Lakhimpur districts marks an end of the road of the Mising ethnic politics with their independent political identity for the first time in the history of “parliamentary struggle” for realizing ethnic aspirations of the community.
The need of addressing the fundamental Mising aspirations
Majority of the Mising public are in the dark about the terms and conditions of the sudden shift. As the key issues of Mising aspirations are not yet addressed, there are concerns of loss of cultural identity and potential threats to language, customs, tradition and resources in the absence of independent political assertion.
The talk of granting constitutional status to tribal autonomous councils including that of Mising Autonomous Council of Assam at the peak of anti-Citizenship Amendment Act movement is nowhere to be seen in the political theatre now. The big dream of achieving Sixth Schedule under the Indian Constitution today is gradually dying down. Of course, it is claimed that the current phase of political alignment is part of the process of ethnic movement itself.
Flood and erosion are one of the prior concerns of the Misings. This perennial problem has triggered displacement and conflict in various parts of upper Assam districts. Natural disaster based internal displacement should get priority in resettlement and rehabilitation agenda. It is compounded by conservation based displacement and worries of eviction from their traditional habitat. In the name of wildlife conservation and expansion of protected areas especially the Kaziranga National Park, it is observed that Mising people of Gohpur and Bokakhat are one of the foremost sufferers. There is need of reviewing the current conservation approach followed by the government that constantly keep indigenous people and forest dwellers under threat of eviction and forceful relocation. There are also demands for Poba reserved forest of Jonai in Assam-Arunachal border should be declared as protected areas. However, from the evergrowing experiences encountered by the people, all these matters need to be carried forward to environment and conservation policymakers of the country . The grievances must find solution. People and conservation must co-exist, they should not be mutually excluded.
In the cultural front, the demand of state holiday on Ali-aye Lígang could not be realized even after years of movement. In the context of development of language, the issue of medium of instruction in mother tongue in Mising inhabited areas in primary schools are not yet addressed. The New Education Policy, 2020 has been welcomed by Mising organizations as it automatically stressed on providing education in mother tongue in primary level. However, given the scenario of language politics prevailing in the state of Assam, the introduction of such language policies will face challenges. Key Mising inhabited area lacks a full-fledged university or a medical college. A proposed campus of Tezpur University which was to be set up in Jonai did not see the light of the day even after years of donation of land by local people. While rehabilitation and land crises are on the rise among the Misings, the Dibru-Saikhowa National Park residents are yet to be fully addressed. Vast majority of people does not own land entitlement certificates. Forest land inhabited by Misings should be dereserved and be accorded as habitat tag.
In the southern bank of Brahmaputra river, the riverine belt from Kaziranga National Park to Bogibeel bridge communities live in pathetic condition in terms of road and communication. Majority of the Mising inhabited river bank areas live a challenging life in monsoon season in districts like Jorhat, Sivasagar and Golaghat. There is a need of attention from policy makers to improve the infrastructure along the river bank to ameliorate the miserable conditions. Raised platforms for cattle are required more in the region. Embankment built in the river bank should be transformed into a highway for better communication in order to address the communication bottleneck beginning from Kaziranga area of Bokakhat to Bogibeel bridge after proper scientific study.
Will national parties be committed to Mising aspiration?
The fundamental aspects of Mising aspirations must be addressed at first while the quest for power and influence might continue like any other politicized ethnic groups. Otherwise, the remnant of ethnic mobilization will not decompose easily even after capturing power in the future. It will, of course, satisfy a section of clietilistic network of followers but collective benefits in the form of public goods cannot be accrued for the community at large. This assembly elections of 2021, for Misings, is nevertheless a new beginning in political participation of the Mising nationalist path. However, common Mising public will wait and watch whether the national parties honour with commitment to the fundamental aspirations of Mising tribe.
It is reported that constitutional status would be granted to Misings and other tribal councils of Assam by the government.The information is confusing because the specific report is not saying about Sixth Schedule. It is said that the chief executive member of the councils would be an ex-officio member of sub-divisional land advisory committee.
There are reports or cabinet decisions for various packages ranging from education, autonomous councils , financial packages, wage increment in tear gardena to state holiday targeted at the six communities demanding schedule tribe status in Assam.
Therefore, regarding so called constitutional status reports in media other than Sixth Schedule is short of the demand by the Mising national organizations.
What could be the constitutional status then?
Else, the Constitution of India have to add certain parts that will mention about these tribal councils.
What is it specifically?
Like Article 371 (A), where there is a protected clause for Nagaland's own control over resources , customary law and practices, there can be a constitutional clauses specifying the tribal councils' land , customs , traditions, social identity etc.
However, there is no clarity on the entire issues. The BJP led state government in Assam seems engaging in political manuevering to deal with the public dissent. These reports are emerging in Assam amidst rising protests against citizenship reforms in the state as well as across the country.
More about Article 371(A):of the Indian Constitution:
The Misings in Upper Assam continue to lose most of their arable territory to constant floods, forcing the affected people to look for alternate living spaces. Often, they find themselves occupying land in protected forest areas, leading to conflict and opposition; both from conservation groups and the local population of the region.
Read more : https://www.epw.in/author/bhasker-pegu-and-manoranjan-pegu
Mising tribesmen inhabiting the Laika and Dodhia areas of Dibru Saikhowa national park in Upper Assam has been struggling for survival space due to continuous flood and erosion coupled with government restrictions since last year. They have been met with opposition from the locals that include indigenous groups and colonial era migrants whenever they were trying to settle down in government notified forest land over last one year. Some section of Assamese dailies have reported the news in a most disparaging manner with the use of words such as khedar parikalpana korise (planning to chase away), khedi pothiouwa (chased away) while reporting the incidents happening in Tinsukia district. The news items with provocative content are no less than incitement to inter-group conflict given the social climate in Assam. It is against public taste of ethical and impartial journalism expected from the local Assamese language media.
Apparently, the government has failed to rehabilitate the suffering people that has compelled them to look for settlement in forest areas in their own. On July, 2017 there was written understanding between the representatives of Mising student union TMPK and the government authorities that the people would be rehabilitated in eight months after similar events erupted in the district.
When even illegal migrants cannot be expelled forcefully by the state but have to follow the procedure established by Indian laws, it is quite disheartening that marginalized indigenous tribe like Mising are accorded with partisan and contemptuous words in the heights of plight in the Assamese language press. Flood, erosion and legal restrictions in National Park have already crippled the Mising tribesmen but some Assamese language media who are dominant in Brahmaputra Valley are celebrating the sufferings with their disparaging and vexatious content devoid of public responsibility and civility. It is no less than adding salt to the wounds.
One can find the proof of content published in Assamese dailies: Niyomiya Barta and Dainik Janambhumi on 25 and 26 February, 2018.
In the month of July, 2017, rural people dwelling in Dibru-Saikhowa National Park from indigenous Mising community were left without a choice amidst opposition of resettlement in Torani reserved forest in Tinsukia district of upper Assam by organizations of indigenous Moran group as well as colonial-era migrant groups such as Adivasis and Gorkhas/ Nepalis. There was ethnic tension between the park dwellers looking for settlement and local people resulting in stand-off for nearly a week.
Source: Pratidin Time Youtube Handle
The ill-conceivedly declared Dibru Saikhowa National Park straddles between Tinsukia and Dibrugarh district. The human dwellers of celebrated protected area who were apparently affected by flood came looking for higher ground for shelter as well as settlement. The media figured it as about 700 men and women. The stand-off was a sort of humanitarian crisis as the Misings were left like 'people of nowhere'. Thus, the tension in ethnic groups from a bigger angle reflects the fight for scarce and most valued resource: land. Even if it is a reserved forest, that is under the government, the people won't allow to settle even an indigenous community whose land has been sacrificed for a greater purpose such as protected areas-national park as the local people wants to preserve it as forest area itself.
The events led to moderate level media coverages in Assamese dailies such as Asomiya Pratidin( with a front page article in the following day of incident by a Mising journalist based in Jonai), Dainik Janambhumi and English daily, The Telegraph. Even Pratidin Time, a local television channel, showed video footages of the stand-off. But it was surprising that none from the civil society groups including the top-notch public intellectuals in Assam utter a voice regarding the helplessness of the tribal people. Is not it a selective silence on such a humanitarian issue?
Since the places has been declared as protected area(national park) under India's laws in 1999, the people of the villages such as Laika and Dodhia are living with a fearful life of dispossession, helplessness and uncertainty. Talks of relocation were in paper and in the words of bureaucrats and politicians but has never been fully implemented. People have no right to build concrete houses. They have no access to state benefits such as housing, health care, education, drinking water and electricity. Is not this a reckless conservation system? Where are those conservation groups at the time of crisis? It is despicable that environmental and wildlife conservation groups did not mince a word at time of stand off at Tarani. Conservation groups may be in need of human rights education as well in addition to what they eulogized.
According to local account, the population in the park is 12,000. They have been in the villages since ages. Some were resettled by the government after the great earthquake of 1950 and some villagers were already settled there even before that. Government who became a source of blessings in1950s has turned out to be curse in 21st century. Putting animal protection first rather than human beings!Human-beings are becoming victims of conservation politics.
Although Assamese dailies does not provide eye-catching front page headlines, they cared to publish few news items in the inside pages about the sufferings of indigenous Misings.
In the first half of August, 90+ Mising women were put into jail in the same Tinsukia district Some included lactating mothers with child. The women were accused of encroachment of Namphai reserved forest. Women are bearing the brunt of fight for living space now. The people who are accused of encroachment are from flood affected riverine areas often prone to erosion and sandcasts leading to landlessness. This has pushed people to fight for survival at the risk of their lives and inviting legal troubles in newer territories.
When people are struggling for basic needs: food and shelter within Assam, this must be enough to raise the conscience of thinking people. Still these incidents are not enough to generate the will of civil society groups and intellectuals to raise their voice for the helpless tribals. May be because of less political stake and influence in the power dynamics in Assam!
There are talks of rehabilitation of refugees and migrants including grant of citizenship to various religious groups from neighbouring countries of India for quite sometime now. One may wonder whether such struggling indigenous tribe within India be declared as refugees in order to get the same priorities and attention of the policymakers and ruling establiments.
Some may claims my observations are not true, therefore, sources of the above facts are provided below:
1.Flood-hit people encroach Tarani
- Tension in reserve forest area in Tinsukia, July 20, The Telegraph
2. Encroachers stay put- Minister reaches out to flood-hot Misings, flood affected people refuse to leave reserve forest, July 23, The Telegraph : https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170723/jsp/northeast/story_163367.jsp
3. 150 families evicted from Namphai reserve forest, Aug,4, 2017, The Times of India: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/guwahati/150-families-evicted-from-namphai-reserve-forest/articleshow/59908972.cms?from=mdr
4. Khilonjiyak loi sorkar nirowb kiyo?( In English: Why is the government silent on indigenous people?) by Royal Pegu, July 22, Asomiya Pratidin: http://asomiyapratidin.in/article.php?date=22-07-2017&page=1&article=5.jpg&cid=376227#.WYq6DLiZkts
5. Encroachers re-occupy cleared land in Namphai RF, arrested, The Assam Tribune, August 8, 2017
The news report in Assamese dailies says that five persons which include teenagers from Dighali village was tied up in a tree at Gelua Tinali near Silapathar in Dhemaji district of Assam and stabbed by knives after a minor scuffle with immigrant Muslim settlers on April 14, 2017. The teenagers named Takuli Mili, 16 and Matang Morang, 17 from Dighali village were returning from market centre after doing a television recharge. Three other youths too were tortured by the immigrants who came to rescue their friends. The injured youths were admitted in Dhemaji civil hospital in night itself. The youth belongs to ethnic minorities group called Mising. They are recognized as Schedule Tribe under Indian constitution. Police arrested 11 persons out of the 19 persons involved in the stabbing incident in 48 hours as pre-emptive measure to prevent inter-group conflict. It is said that the following morning tribal villagers came to immigrant Muslim village looking for the tormentors but police fired bullets on air and tear gas shell to disperse the agitated people. The district administration clamped Section 144 /curfew but in between one cowshed and a dome of paddy straw was lit with fire. The local legislative member, Bhubon Pegu took a stick and engaged along with police in dispersing the agitated villagers, the dailies reports. The women folk took to protest alleging that even after four days all the persons involved in the gruesome incident were not arrested by police.
There has been a consistent effort from chauvinist quarters to undermine and destroy the identities of small ethnic groups in Assam. The ethnic groups are victims of suppression in terms of the language and culture because they are hardly influential in political arena where electoral politics takes precedence and more importance to numbers than humane consideration in a populous country like India. I would like to point out a latest unethical public policy carried out by the Indian Railways where Mising ethnic group's identity has been sidelined in their own inhabited region which can be called "denial of identity, recognition and belongingness"through hegemonic nomenclature practice on particular train that connects to their soil from the main city of Assam, Guwahati.
The railway notification for the nomenclature. Source: NFR/ Facebook page
The Kamakhya-Murkongselek Intercity Express that was started in 2015 after a gap of decade due to conversion to broad gauge (BG) brought many cheers to the people in upstream north bank of Siang river, the region characterized by underdevelopment and non-industrialization in Assam. Being inhabited mostly by tribals, it is one of the most neglected region in the state. Silapathar, which is in the same region, was recently in news due to the attack on a local office of influential student union by supporters of refugee rights body.
The train to Murkongselek, which was once a part of North East Frontier Agency (NEFA) now Arunachal, was introduced post-1962 Sino-Indian war as metre gauge (MG) line in 1976. The foothill Mising inhabited region was clubbed under the "Excluded Areas" (Sadiya and Balipara Frontier Tracts ) in the colonial British period that followed restrictive intervention in interaction and policy matters and total exemption from provincial laws unlike the other plains part of Assam.The then MG train was named Arunachal Express. But, what surprises many in recent times in greater Murkongselek region (also known as Jonai) is the Indian Railways lack of demographic and cultural sensitivity after the introduction of BG line. Without any consultation with any quarters, the train was named via notification in March , 2017 as Lachit Express, which has no cultural resonance with the place. The Mising people, who are otherwise the second largest tribal group, having their own language and culture, came under the grip of hegemonic project adopted by ruling elite's parochial nationalists. The Mising has no influential and conscious leaders in the political quarters which could had exert influence or offer resistance to such chauvinist policy. There has been many trains running from dominant Assamese elite belt such as Tinsukia, Dibrugarh, Guwahati , Kamakhya which are also a developed and industrialized region located in the south bank for many decades almost to all parts of India. The majoritarian communities has produced influential leaders who has enormous say in policy matters of Assam since the post-independent period. There cannot be just one but ten of trains named after the great general Lachit Borphukan. But it remain a questionable policy as to why the north bank's tribal belt was targeted?
The order copy from Indian Railways to Guwahati office. Source: Facebook
These trains running for decades in southern bank of Siang/ Brahmaputra has never been named Lachit Express but some has quietly pushed the nomenclature to a place where train has been introduced in recent times. It may be noted that Rajen Gohain, a long time BJP Assamese MP is the minister of state for railways in India whereas Suresh Prabhu is the union minister of railways. The policy matters relating to Assam and the northeast must have been under the Assam minister's charge. If he was not aware of it or involved in naming it, he should help in withdrawing the same as matter of ethical public policy practice .
Screenshot from IRCTC app, notice the nomenclature
Source: The Assam Tribune news on inauguration of new train to Murkongselek in June 19, 1976
The train to Murkongselek was named Arunachal Express. The news report also mentioned Murkongselek was in Arunachal Pradesh.
The Naharlagun-Guwahati Intercity Express was named Donyi Polo Express with an indigenous name which literally means Sun-Moon, respecting the animist belief of the indigenous tribes of Arunachal Pradesh. In the same vein, why the only train that connects Mising inhabited place from Guwahati be not named with a fitting cultural nomenclature? If not, the train should be reverted to previous name itself i.e. the destination nomenclature and be left without any hegemonic politics. This hegemony over small tribes by majoritarian elite must stop in Assam, they should know to respect and provide space of identity of belongingness and presence in the fruits of infrastructure development too.
The train was inaugurated by then Assam CM Sarat Chandra Sinha,one of most progressive chief minister Assam ever had, in presence of S. Tayeng from AP due to absence of CM Prem Khandu Thungon..
Oi nitom, a form of Mising folk song, composed based on "Intercity Express" will be a living testimony against imposition of nomenclature.
There must be equality for all people irrespective of their numbers in our democracy. There should not be forced and malicious imposition. Assam has multiple cultures, it does not just belong to certain privileged linguistic groups. The composite character must be uphold.
N.B. We are not against Lachit's ideals and his great deeds in protecting Assam. One of our great warriors Miri Sandikoi was subordinate of Lachit, fought in the historic battle of Saraighat of 1671 to repel Mughal invaders. Many Mising soldiers took part in the battle.For further details on the role of Miri Sandikoi (Hazarika), please read eminent historian Surya Kumar Bhuyan's book , Lachit Borphukan and His Times. The step taken by Ministry of Railways reflects Mising's contribution to peace and harmony being undermined, cultural insensitivity and ignorance about the demographic significance of the region.
As the regional
television channels, local dailies and social media users are updating their
views on noted ethnic Mising Tani leader Ranoj Pegu’s exit in the context of
upcoming Dhemaji by-poll, I felt I should write on this transition that would
likely to have implications in the Mising nationality’s political life in
particular and northeast Assam’s politics in general in the years to come. The
Misings are the second largest recognized Schedule Tribe social group in Assam.
Since the 1980s,
Mising people has been demanding political autonomy under the Sixth Schedule
even before Ranoj Pegu’s entry into marginalized tribal people’s movement. The
Mising Agom Kebang (MAK), the literary body, was formed in 1972. The MAK too
had the roots with Adi and Mising tribes students and teachers led alfresco
feast while in Cotton College, one of the oldest centres of higher learning,
founded in 1901 in northeast India. The apex body, Mising Bane Kebang, was formed as old as in 1924 in the colonial
period. Student organizations such as the Takam Mising Porin Kebang (TMPK) had
the history of organization in co-ordination with Adi students since the days
of India’s independence in 1947.
Ranoj Pegu is known
for Left-oriented political inclination. It is said that Vinod Mishra faction
of Communist Party of India-Marxist-Leninist (CPI-ML) had considerable
influence on Karbi and Mising national
organizations struggling for autonomous state and constitutional autonomy in
their respective inhabited areas. I
called it Leftist-orientation because Mising ethnic movement is independent of
Left parties although it has mixed influences of Marxist, Leninist and Maoist political philosophy. Pegu, a son of civil servant originally
hailing from fringes of Kaziranga National Park of Bokakhat, is said to be
educated in Shankardev Seminary at Jorhat and Guwahati Medical College and
Hospital. However, Ranoj Pegu is more contemporaneous in north bank of Siang
river of Assam where majority of the Mising lives. He mostly shuttles between
Gogamukh, head quarter of MAC, of which he is the chief executive member and
Guwahati, the capital city of Assam. There were fratricidal clashes in 1990s
between the supporters of Indian National Congress party-influenced Mising
Autonomous Demand Committee (MADC) and the national bodies such as the TMPK, Mising
Mimag Kebang (MMK), Takam Mising Mime Kebang (TMMK) in Mising inhabited
areas. The intense struggle for
supremacy and influence among the political organizations created an atmosphere of chaos and
anarchy in the less-governed inaccessible Mising territories of those times. The infamous
1995 Bilmukh killings of Mising ethnic nationalists over the grant of
boundary-less Mising Autonomous Council (MAC) by security personnel was the
consequence of tussle and differences among the ethnic leaderships.
Come 21st
century, there was a change in the political course in Mising autonomy
movement. During the early Congress-led state government, after regionalist
Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) was defeated in 2001,
constituted Cabinet sub-committee to study the feasibility of Sixth Schedule based autonomy but it was met
with violent opposition from neighboring indigenous communities in the north
bank of Siang/ Brahmaputra river. The government
response was due to the Mising-Rabha-Tiwa alliance popular movements in their
respective belts and demonstrations for autonomy in New Delhi and Dispur. Thus,
it led to undeclared moratorium of growing intense non-violent political mobilization for autonomy. In 2006, the Mising leadership prior to state assembly poll with
other sympathizers in their inhabited areas founded the Sanmilita Ganshakti,
Asom, a micro-regional party with Leftist orientation that claimed to fight for
marginalized communities in the upstream belt of north bank of Siang in Assam. It
vowed to wage ‘’parliamentary struggle’’ instead of armed movement in contrast
to the tendency of many ethnic groups in northeast India. However, in contrary
to perception from media it would be wrong to called Ganshakti as Mising-only
party. It draws supporters and political aspirants from neighboring
communities in the Tani belt. A simple analysis of elected representatives of MAC in 2013 poll clears the air. By
then, the political tempo had resulted in strong support-base for pro-Sixth
Schedule voice particularly in Jonai, Dhemaji, Majuli and Dhakhuakhana constituencies
challenging the ruling Congress party along with parallel anti-autonomy organizations mainly from the indigenous non-tribal Assamese-speaking populace. Bhubon Pegu won the Jonai
constituency in 2006 from Ganshakti party. In 2011, he lost to Congress’
candidate Pradan Baruah. Bhubon Pegu, son of a forest officer from Silapathar,
has the distinction of being a former general secretary of Cotton College Union
Society (CCUS) at prestigious Cotton College. Pegu has huge following in
Mising-inhabited areas which was established during his days at TMPK and
subsequent struggle for Sixth Schedule based autonomy. Sixth Schedule became a buzzword
in Mising society in early 2000s during his leadership for political autonomy
where Johan Doley was the president of TMPK. In 2016, he won again with the distinction of
being the only independent candidate elected to Assam assembly when there was
Modi-wave in most of constituencies of Assam that promised security for ‘jati,
mati and bheti (nation, land and homestead) under the leadership of former All Assam
Students’ Union (AASU) leader, Sarbananda Sonowal. It may be recalled that the Ganshakti, having Leftist-orientation, did not enter into pre-poll alliance unlike other smaller parties in the 2016 Assam poll.
Ranoj Pegu and Bhubon Pegu seen with Sarbananda Sonowal Photo: Facebook
The Mising political imagination
of achieving constitutional autonomy is on the crossroad. The main steering figures
of non-violent political struggle for autonomy such as Ranoj Pegu joining of
BJP and Bhubon Pegu’s hinting of joining
the saffron outfit marks an era of mainstreaming of Mising ethnic nationalism to pan-Indian
nationalist fold after a break of three decades. Three decades can be counted
from post-Assam Accord (1985) to BJP’s triumph with the mantra of aligning the “khilonjia’’
(indigenous) in 2016 assembly election. The advent of populist Hindu nationalist fervor
since 2014 together with many regional sub-nationalist leaders aligning with
BJP in Assam may be attributed to the exit of ethnic leaders. And most
significantly, the decades of experiences and experiments of parliamentary
politics on Mising ethnic nationalist plank could be the factors behind this
development.
Drawing from theories
of international relations, the latest political development in Mising
political life may be identified as “endism''. Endism is different from
declinism. While declinism is conditionally pessimistic that provides warning
to the pathway to historical decline of ethnic politics and longing for reverse
political state but endism signifies unwavering optimism with the illusion of
well-being and escape from history (emphasis added). According to Sameul P.
Huntington, endism does not provide corrective action but relaxed
complacency. There is a widespread hope, optimism and complacency in the society
that Mising ethnic leaders are joining the alliance of powers. Endism, when
consequences are met with errors, could be far more “dangerous and subversive.”
The ‘political’ Mising society, bereft
of its key personalities and ideologues, may riddle into disarray. It may also lead to 'no exit" at all from the ethnic politics but a shift in the cycle of Mising ethnic nationalism. Nevertheless,
the forthcoming by-poll of Dhemaji constituency, whether Ranoj Pegu wins or
loses, would be an outlier in the political history of the community.
(Views expressed here are entirely personal. This article doesn't reflect the views of institutions or organizations the author is associated with.)
Lékoda Silapothar do odo longédokédémbulum ka:la gíla gíkun tani lukampé 2 kilometre kopé procession dé
iyyapé dokké 10, 000ko:pé giminé tani
dungai. Gimin ne tani kidi de ko:kang kamangi, mine-mijing, yame-mimbir,
ne-milbong gidagai . Kanggabla ka:nampe aike agom lok placarddokké poster appidém attagai. Aiké
genam-bomnamém gebomdagai. Mising amo:lo kape edempe idun takam Misingei
taddung ? Mising kébang kidi dok bulum Silapothar dok doying em okkomna luyen
tani taudung? Misingképé Aasu dé amik
opinlok porin kébang. Bengali détu amik kérung, bulu okolai lokké gidung
émnamdé ta:to-ya:yo manggom 50 ditag Mising tani ko iné taumiloi kinyé.
Ludaggomsin Silapothar dé ngoluk Mising among lo dung, émdaggom ngolukké émna
tokuma:bo. The Telegraph dé attak 25-30 per cent
ko Bengali yé dung. 2001 census léngkankampé 22, 307 ko tani dung.
Supak 30000 anindupé bong.Town
committee do:tu séko du:dakji kindagai.
2014 do BJP pa:la central
(ki:ni)odokkéstate government so 2016
do BJP pa:ma dapébong “Hindu refugee” émsin citizenship biyé émna buluk
“manifesto” doi bitak. Émpila 2016 do Citizenship Amendment Bill 2016 émnam ko
Parliament do tosatak “refugee” kídí dém lomdanla citizen pé idopé. AASU odokké
angu-angu Assam sok kébangé édém ilam:ye émna lutíla ajéngém jé:la dung.Sok “khilonjia”/ “tholuwa”/ “indigenous/
“mo:di sok ommang” taniyé “minority” pagyé agom , tani, migom gomnam (politics)
appílok émna.
Agomdém
sapyémiloSilapathar do kapil Mising
asop dun? Ngok méngkipé sé do:ying kídí sokkipak: Misingé mé:ra sula du:padak :
2004 dok “independence day” loDhemaji do bomb bukmola ngoluk Sixth Schedule modak
do “law and order” ngasod aba:yang ko angkang abbuk jomapé sékri inam mimakdo.
Dhemaji district dém bojéko “militarized”zone pé imoto. Dhemaji tém séko bayukkanbuk mop lage émna, angu district patomapéyam (Ngolu army camp ru:yi lo
saikel dugyém lo:dém gíy bekdungai édé sin iskul lendom. Police ésin émmumpé
ngolum yuméko lock-up lo léngkita)
Jonai do Ali-a:yé Lígang dírbí yumédo 2008 do
séko bullan bomb bugmonékidé, édémpé sékkai opinlok dirbi yumélok bugmo kitakne
Assam so okolai? Sékom ménggédan? Sékai mipak organization “culprit” kídídém
etgabla “justice” pabopé lage émdune? 2016 assembly election do takam adjin
opiné BJP manggom Congress do “alliance” ito,Sanmilata Ganashakti, Assam
éla Autonomous State Demand Committee (Karbi Anglong) mégela.
Bengali lok “Bongo Sena”dé Karbi dité
talédo angupé Bangladesh “Hindu Bengali du:téng: mayeku émna longku lenkang
émnabdém kindanlang ngoluk tani kídídé? Sapyémilo Ganshakti dok dunggab ko:dém
rago ko:pak monam légang “Hindu” “refugee” kídí dok do:yingém itélíkla igo-siro
dung.
NiBBUSS dé Rashtriya Swayam Sevak(RSS)
dok alagkan kébangko émna lugéngko
kadung. Buluk President Subodh Biswas émnamdé Nagpur do du:dak émna lutad bigoné
ope:yé ludak. RSS dé BJP lok luyir odokké bélam sutkan biné abu é.
“Citizenship” dok “politics” dém odo idung okol mipak agom luné opeye sin bojek
kamaji, tribel bojeko dungkodo. Tribel kébang lok érokné kébang dém andan
ge:la. NiBBUSS dé Morigaon do:sin édémípin kébang iyé émnamko ludagamalang.
Morigaon dé Tiwa lok du:téng mo:diyé okolo mipak opeyéyasin gingane tani
abayangkaboji. Jorhat, Dibrugarh, Guwahati, Silchar odobulu édé kébangdém
ilatomane sékriru:pé ipé mé:mílo?
Mising agom lok sign board/ poster ko mo:la “aíké” émnam tani kídídém “ayang”
ko léngkandagne ngoluk amo:lo dung émla. Mising tani lokképé annyi opíndéi édílai
lokkébong ngolum aíkémpé mé:mang émna léngkan la dung. Annyi déi Mising ké
pé“amme” (other) pé ila dung.
Gopinath Bordoloi 1947 ma:da:pébong
“reserved constituency” dokké tribal belt ilen bo:ye émna odo gígéboné tribal
leaders kídar dém luka. Odokképak Bordoloi ké ibonam Assam Congress Committee
do gímínka:ku. Tribal leaders Bhimbor Deuri, Rupnath Brahma, Rabi Chandra
Kachari, Karko Chandra Do:le bulu Bharat sé “independence” ma:da:pé angu modi
lok gi:né amme tribal lok among ém dungkulub bomye émnamdém ka:bekdagai. Tribal
belt and block lo amo:lo amme (non-tribal) é amongém la:la ma:yé réla ma:yé
émnam ko 1938 do:bo lunamkilédupésin
édémípé iyépé émna mé:tinsuto. Po:pé Congressé taniyém ginga líktak mílo, supak lottado sok tani-íngém mo:ríd do:pé karé dém rébidung suppakké migomsé.
“It
will be ensured that relevant laws for prevention of encroachment of government
lands and
lands
in tribal belts and blocks are strictly enforced and unauthorized encroachers
evicted as
laid down under such laws.” ( Traibel dungko belts dokké blocksamong éla migom amongém lupa-tatpasuma:pé dungkabbomném la:pakyéku runggo atténg saptékdanla)
Sé adnam sém éddíko supakké ayir sok
migomé ménggabla gerduji édépék nérkík agomdé. Odo mé:dak Silapathar démpin
ngasodém lékoda sido Assam “mo:di sok ommang” (sons of soil) ka:bekma:yé dokké
lékopé ager tarungém iyar tílayé.
Réngamké
angka:nam (nationalism)
Assam sok mipak réngam manggom Boro
réngam lokang ka:nam kayir sula Mising
taniésin dakropa:yé émna dekkoi mé:né dung. Silapathar dok pa:mínsudaklédupéMising lok porin kébang édémarpésin kínggípé imín-gímínla ang léngkan
toma, luyémílo “limited participation”itak. Sapyémílo mipak ang démmikjém gel gímín ma:nam de aidak. Buluk kolok ang dém ka:yir suma:pé
Assamese agom éla gomlab (language
and literature) la:sa bokunamdémpak ka:yir supénammé, angu kídí takamdém aidak
émna luguma, réngam agl£ng ka:mínsunam pé iyé. Mé:po ménganla sékri du:nam dé
ajukayé. Réngam ang-kanamdém kangkanpé
irop pé réngam ako murkong-tarung dok dakra su:namdémpak (economically
self-reliant) irop po:payé. Amikolok réngam ager gerdung émla murkong
langkumsunam (kumlai la:daggom morítlai la:daggom) dírbídém mokab pa:yé..
